Using the events based upon political leaders on their decisions, in relation to negotiations about the NBA officials and the players in the lockout, here are my opinions.
-In negotiations, both sides being addressed are effective, rather than one side calling all the shots. Though officials are the ones heading operations, the general public (the players in the Lockout, for example) should contribute a vital part in decisions.
Another contributing factor is the assessment of values and rules. Because of the diversity of people, values and rules pose differences that can cause tension for coming at a conclusion. Still, both the officials and public must be innovative and ready for action for disputes to be settled. In our society, the government is comprised of elected officials and the common people. For disputes to be effectively settled, matters should be discussed as a whole body, where the values of the sides are taken in mind. Problems like calling war soldiers back home, or economic bailouts will almost always have differing viewpoints on the situation and solution. Even if the solution promises benefit, it may be temporary and might entail consequences, such as calling back troops to America, leaving no units to train those in the Middle East for defense. However, it's best to be prepared for action and try hard to settle conflicts.
Now if only consensus is reached in the lockout...even with all the promises of equalizing the percentage of four billion dollar salary, the prohibition of exceeding finances for signing players, and salary cap, the negotiators must retain their action.
No comments:
Post a Comment